Was Atlantis Real? Four Books That Say YES!
What we know of Atlantis comes from Plato, and the evidence that the known ancient civilizations share a common and even older heritage. Many books have explored this heritage and attempted to prove that Atlantis was real. These four books make a persuasive case.
All we really know about Atlantis came from Plato, a student of Socrates, who reported in two works called the Critias and the Timaeus about the island kingdom. The Critias has survived in fragmentary form, giving us a physical description, and the Timaeus, a longer work, adds more information about how the nation eventually was conquered by Greeks and disappeared into the ocean.
Here is some of the physical description from Plato's Critias:
WHAT PLATO SAID:
The KingsAnd at the very beginning they built the palace in the habitation of the god and of their ancestors, which they continued to ornament in successive generations, every king surpassing the one who went before him to the utmost of his power, until they made the building a marvel to behold for size and for beauty. And beginning from the sea they bored a canal of three hundred feet in width and one hundred feet in depth and fifty stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this, which became a harbour, and leaving an opening sufficient to enable the largest vessels to find ingress. |
Moreover, they divided at the bridges the zones of land which parted the zones of sea, leaving room for a single trireme to pass out of one zone into another, and they covered over the channels so as to leave a way underneath for the ships; for the banks were raised considerably above the water. Now the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was three stadia in breadth, and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two zones, the one of water, the other of land, were two stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was a stadium only in width. The island in which the palace was situated had a diameter of five stadia. All this including the zones and the bridge, which was the sixth part of a stadium in width, they surrounded by a stone wall on every side, placing towers and gates on the bridges where the sea passed in.
The stone which was used in the work they quarried from underneath the centre island, and from underneath the zones, on the outer as well as the inner side. One kind was white, another black, and a third red, and as they quarried, they at the same time hollowed out double docks, having roofs formed out of the native rock. Some of their buildings were simple, but in others they put together different stones, varying the colour to please the eye, and to be a natural source of delight. The entire circuit of the wall, which went round the outermost zone, they covered with a coating of brass, and the circuit of the next wall they coated with tin, and the third, which encompassed the citadel, flashed with the red light of orichalcum.
The palaces in the interior of the citadel were constructed on this wise:-in the centre was a holy temple dedicated to Cleito and Poseidon, which remained inaccessible, and was surrounded by an enclosure of gold; this was the spot where the family of the ten princes first saw the light, and thither the people annually brought the fruits of the earth in their season from all the ten portions, to be an offering to each of the ten. Here was Poseidon's own temple which was a stadium in length, and half a stadium in width, and of a proportionate height, having a strange barbaric appearance. All the outside of the temple, with the exception of the pinnacles, they covered with silver, and the pinnacles with gold.
In the interior of the temple the roof was of ivory, curiously wrought everywhere with gold and silver and orichalcum; and all the other parts, the walls and pillars and floor, they coated with orichalcum. In the temple they placed statues of gold: there was the god himself standing in a chariot-the charioteer of six winged horses-and of such a size that he touched the roof of the building with his head; around him there were a hundred Nereids riding on dolphins, for such was thought to be the number of them by the men of those days. There were also in the interior of the temple other images which had been dedicated by private persons. And around the temple on the outside were placed statues of gold of all the descendants of the ten kings and of their wives, and there were many other great offerings of kings and of private persons, coming both from the city itself and from the foreign cities over which they held sway. There was an altar too, which in size and workmanship corresponded to this magnificence, and the palaces, in like manner, answered to the greatness of the kingdom and the glory of the temple.
In the next place, they had fountains, one of cold and another of hot water, in gracious plenty flowing; and they were wonderfully adapted for use by reason of the pleasantness and excellence of their waters. They constructed buildings about them and planted suitable trees, also they made cisterns, some open to the heavens, others roofed over, to be used in winter as warm baths; there were the kings' baths, and the baths of private persons, which were kept apart; and there were separate baths for women, and for horses and cattle, and to each of them they gave as much adornment as was suitable. Of the water which ran off they carried some to the grove of Poseidon, where were growing all manner of trees of wonderful height and beauty, owing to the excellence of the soil, while the remainder as conveyed by aqueducts along the bridges to the outer circles; and there were many temples built and dedicated to many gods; also gardens and places of exercise, some for men, and others for horses in both of the two islands formed by the zones; and in the centre of the larger of the two there was set apart a race-course of a stadium in width, and in length allowed to extend all round the island, for horses to race in.
Also there were guardhouses at intervals for the guards, the more trusted of whom were appointed-to keep watch in the lesser zone, which was nearer the Acropolis while the most trusted of all had houses given them within the citadel, near the persons of the kings. The docks were full of triremes and naval stores, and all things were quite ready for use. Enough of the plan of the royal palace.
Leaving the palace and passing out across the three you came to a wall which began at the sea and went all round: this was everywhere distant fifty stadia from the largest zone or harbour, and enclosed the whole, the ends meeting at the mouth of the channel which led to the sea. The entire area was densely crowded with habitations; and the canal and the largest of the harbours were full of vessels and merchants coming from all parts, who, from their numbers, kept up a multitudinous sound of human voices, and din and clatter of all sorts night and day.
Where was Atlantis and what happened to it? Here is the explanation from the Timaeus:
The most famous of them all was the overthrow of the island of Atlantis. This great island lay over against the Pillars of Heracles, in extent greater than Libya and Asia put together, and was the passage to other islands and to a great ocean of which the Mediterranean sea was only the harbour; and within the Pillars the empire of Atlantis reached in Europe to Tyrrhenia and in Libya to Egypt. This mighty power was arrayed against Egypt and Hellas and all the countries bordering on the Mediterranean. Then your city did bravely, and won renown over the whole earth. For at the peril of her own existence, and when the other Hellenes had deserted her, she repelled the invader, and of her own accord gave liberty to all the nations within the Pillars. A little while afterwards there were great earthquakes and floods, and your warrior race all sank into the earth; and the great island of Atlantis also disappeared in the sea. This is the explanation of the shallows which are found in that part of the Atlantic ocean.
Alantis, it seems, was a large and powerful nation with control of the ocean which is named after it. Many books have been written about Atlantis, some drawing on Plato’s description and some, like Graham Hancock’s work, arriving at the conclusion that Altantis must have existed because of the evidence for a “mother culture.”
Here are four books a dedicated Atlantis buff should read.
The man who first told us the sphinx is much older than we’d been told,
John Anthony West is a controversial figure in archeology. He steps on a lot of toes. But he
does it with grace scholarship. His pivotal book, Serpent in the Sky, is based on the work of a
French archeologist, Schwaller de Lubicz, whose work was pretty much ignored in the
English-speaking world. Schwaller de Lubicz had a different view of Egyptian history than that
preented by other Egyptologist and West feels that if Schwaller is right (and or course West
thinks he is), then there are implications for our entire civiliztion. For one thing, he feels
what he has to say about Egypt proves the existence of Atlantis as the culture antedating
classic Egypt. Egypt, according to this view, inherited the Atlantean culture and knowledge.
West has studied Schwaller, and this book is his presentation of the ideas uncovered by
Schwaller’s many years in Egypt studying its monuments. The Egyptians, in this view, were
highly advanced in science, mathematics, and philosophy. They used a great many symbols in
their writing and depictions, and these have been misunderstood. This book is liberally
illustrated with photos and drawings that help explain and reinforce the ideas. It is
well-written and makes a persuasive case for an older and more sophisticated culture than
modern archeologists have been willing to accept. John Anthony West is an icon for the
alternative history folks and if you want to delve into the controversies surrounding
ancient Egypt, you must read this book.
Buy
Serpent in the Sky at Amazon.Com
This book, written back in 1882 by US Congressman Ignatius Donnelly, is a much-quoted classic
on the subject of Atlantis. I have the Egerton Sykes edition published in 1949 which I got
free from a library that put out a table of old books it was throwing away (never pass up a
source of books, especially free ones). Reading Donnelly’s impassioned discourse showing the
rightness of Plato’s story really got me interested in knowing more. This book, which I first
read many years ago, was a catalyst for me; I’ve been hooked on Atlantis ever since and that
old library cast-off is still an important part of MY library.
The story of Atlantis has intrigued countless generations of people, and Donnelly makes a good
case. He presents a lot of cultural data, showing connections between old and new world customs
and language. He examines the prevalence of a story of a deluge that left the earth flooded,
with only a few survivors; the flood could be a collective remembrance of the sinking of
Atlantis. He looks at the origin of plants and animals, pointing to a common and ancient
culture as the explanation for the same flora and fauna being found in different parts of the
world. There are also some strange social customs that are found throughout the world
(one example is "the couvade," a custom whereby men go to bed and suffer when their wives
are having a baby).
For Donnelly, Atlantis was the Garden of Eden, a wonderful place with no aliens, only happy
humans living the good life. They enjoyed a mild and pleasant climate, had plenty of fruit
trees and fertile land to grow crops, they had mighty ships that sailed the seas, and they
had their beautiful palace with walls of orichalcum (whatever that was). Plato tells us the
land surrounding the capital “may compare with any region in the world for the variety and
excellence of its fruits and the suitableness of its pastures to every sort of animal.” The
ten tribes, descended from the product of a union of god and human female, ruled the land,
which was made up of a number of islands. The capital city was fabulous, with its huge statue
of Poseiden at the entrance to the main palace. Donnelly takes Plato literally about where
Atlantis was located: in the Atlantic Ocean. He adheres to the notion that it sank in one
day and one night, taking most of its inhabitants with it. He also tries to make a claim
that the Atlanteans who survived were the ancestors of the Indo-European or Aryan people.
Donnelly didn’t get it all right and had no access to modern dating methods or what we now
know about the ocean bottom, but he does tell an interesting and well-thought out tale.
He follows carefully what Plato said, then presents his evidence. I’m not surprised this old
classic is still in print and available. If you’re an Atlantis buff, you cannot miss reading
Donnelly. He still makes a lot of sense.
Read Donnelly for free!!!
Buy a copy online, in a bookstore, or read it for free by
clicking here to go to a
web site that has the entire text. You can also buy
a paperback version of
Atlantis: The Antediluvian World at Amazon.Com.
When you begin to study the subject of Atlantis, you will eventually come to the Edgar Cayce
material. See my article on Cayce and the many books available about him. He was born in the
backwoods of Kentucky, an uneducated and seemingly ordinary man who died in 1944. But he was
not like you and me; he had a gift that let him see things and know things that are hidden
from the rest of us. He discovered this gift when he first went into a trance and made an
accurate medical diagnosis. He did many of these medcal “readings” but he is best known for
the “life readings” he did for people. In a trance, he would tell people of their other lives,
and many had lived previously in Atlantis. Cayce was a devout Christian with no prior belief in
reincarnation or in Atlantis, so what he said during these trances amazed even him.
Cayce’s readings were always transcribed and an organization devoted to them (the ARE) has
made them available for study. Cayce’s two sons, Edgar Evans Cayce and Hugh Lynn Cayce, have
both written books or provided Introductions for books others have written that are based on
the concepts in these readings. This book, Edgar Cayce on Atlantis, pulls together
what Cayce had to say about Atlantis through these life readings. He paints an interesting
picture of the past. For example, he talks about a meeting 50,000 years ago in which
participants came in flying machines. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss what to do
about large animals that were menacing the earth. Like many of the things he said in trance,
this alleged meeting is a totally new revelation and does not fit with anything previously
known from any source. Surprisingly, he also mentions an ice-free Antarctica only 6000
years ago.
Cayce also tells us there were three separate destructions of Atlantis, with the last and
final destruction happening about 10,000 years ago. This destruction was apparently at least
in part from misuse of technology on th epart of the Atlanteans. Their power source was a
crystal that could remotely control vehicles that went on land, through the air and under
the sea. While this kind of techology is not mentioned by Plato, remember that Atlantis
existed over a long period of time and, according to Cayce, experienced more than one
destruction.
The people of Atlantis were deeply divided over a number of issues. He classifies them as
either “Children of the Law of One” or “Sons of Belial” These groups had different values,
especially concerning another group he calls the “things” which were apparently a
less-developed people who had been subjugated to serve the Sons of Belial. The Cayce readings,
given over many years time, are internally consistent. He also tells us that those who fled
the final Atlantean destruction brought their records with them and these records of Atlantis
are in the Hall of Records, a chamber somewhere near or under the sphinx. The ARE has
sponsored research in Egypt to try to find these records. Other survivors of Atlantis
went to Mexico and Peru.
At first hearing, you might be inclined to think Cayce a fraud, but once you learn his
history and see the consistency of what he reported, it becomes clear that he was not just
making it all up. Nor was he “channeling” this information from a spirit. Instead, Cayce was
apparently what is called the Akashic Record, a collection of all human knowledge that
exists “somewhere.” Cayce was somehow able to tap into the past, possibly party through the
agency of the person receiving the reading.
Cayce has been credited with making many accurate predictions, although some are opne to
nterpretation. he said parts of Atlantis would "reappear" in the 1960s, and that period
in which a rock formation was found near Bimini that could be man-made. But he also said
New York would be under water by now, predicting dramatic earth changes in the 1990s.
However, if you believe the future is not fixed, then some predictions won't come to pass.
We HAVE seen earth changes in the form of global warming that may eventually put New York
under water. Whatever your beliefs about prophecy, the Cayce material is as good as any of
the other meager sources we have about Atlantis.
Buy Edgar Cayce
on Atlantis at Amazon.Com.
This book, with its electrifying ideas about the reality and the location of Atlantis, was
both exciting and disappointing. The basic idea in it -- that Atlantis was in Antarctica --
is exciting, and the Flem-Aths present some interesting evidence. But the book seemed to
fall short of proving the idea and left me wanting more information. Still, I find the idea
compelling, even if it doesn’t follow Plato’s description of where Atlantis was (but what did
Plato know? He was getting it all fourth hand from some Egyptian priest). This theory borrows
a lot from Hapgood, but postulates a rapid shifting of the earth’s crust (instead of
the slow shifting postulated by Hapgood) and so rests on a catostrphic ending for the
Atlantean homeland. This follows Plato, who said the island kingdom sank “in a single day
and night of misfortune.” It also accounts for frozen mammoths found with flowers in their
stomachs.
Basically, the earth’s crust
sometimes begins to slip and the pole shifts to a new location. The last north
pole location, according to this theory, was in the Hudson Bay. If you look at
its antipodal -- the opposite side of the earth -- you see that it lifts a good
portion of the Antactic continent out of the Antarctic Circle and up into a
temperate climate. Plato said that the Atlantiean land was “greater in extent
than Libya and Asia.” It was not just a little island (which is why I rule out
Crete, which is in the wrong place and is the wrong size.), but a real
continent. Antarctica is a continent and has all the features (mountaind,
rivers, harbors, islands) Plato described. There is one problem though:
Antarctica did not sink into the ocean, but was instead covered by ice! Could
parts of it, islands that might have been near the Palmer Peninsula, have sunk?
It seems all the theories of Atlantis have some discrepancy from Plato’s
description, but this theory does have a lot going for it. We’ve had many
locations suggested for Atlantis -- Crete, an island near the British Isles, The
Canary Islands, the Bahamas, and on and on. Now we have Antarctica. I actually
like this idea and think this book is worth a read. Besides, it’s available in
inexpensive paperback.
Buy
When the Sky Fell at Amazon.Com.